[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is Scilab DSFG free, now ?



non-free.
> The INRIA and the ENPC authorize you free of charge to circulate
> and distribute for no charge, for non-commercial purposes the source
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and/or object code of DERIVED SOFTWARE on any present and future
> support, providing:
and 
> d) Any commercial use or circulation of the DERIVED SOFTWARE shall
> have been previously authorized by INRIA and ENPC.

Violates DFSG 6.No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor 

Martin Quinson said:
> Hello,
> 
> A new version of Scilab (a matlab-like program) is out, and they claim this
> version to be free. (for now, it is in the non-free part of debian)
> 
> Extract from the announcement:
> 
> | Others improvements
> | -------------------
> | A more explicit "free licence". It is no longer required to send back
> | any notice.
> 
> [...]
> 
> |                     Is it really free?
> |     	             -------------------
> |
> | Yes it is. Scilab is not distributed under GPL or other standard free
> | software copyrights, but Scilab is an Open Source Software as stated
> | precisely in the Copyright file licence.txt.
> 
> This file is available online at the adress:
> 
> http://www-rocq.inria.fr/scilab/license.txt
> 
> I would like to have your input on the DFSG complience of this licence. Some
> points are not so clear to me, but I far from being an expert of theses kind
> of questions.
> 
> Thanks for telling me what you think of this licence.
> 
> Bye, Mt.
> 

jeff

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffry Smith      Technical Sales Consultant     Mission Critical Linux
smith@missioncriticallinux.com   phone:603.930.9739 fax:978.446.9470
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought for today:  DPer /dee-pee-er/ n. 

 Data Processor.  Hackers are
   absolutely amazed that suits use this term self-referentially. 
   Computers process data, not people!  See DP.




Reply to: