debian-legal Mar 2000 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
What type of license for iozone
bug1
Re: What type of license for iozone
Henning Makholm
Re: What type of license for iozone
Don Marti
Unidentified subject!
debian-legal-request
<Possible follow-ups>
Unidentified subject!
debian-legal-request
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
¿µ¾î,ÀÏ¾î »ýÈ°È¸È ¹«·á mailing service ¾È³»!!
ÀÌÇö¿ì
[Fwd: license for iozone]
bug1
Re: [Fwd: license for iozone]
Henning Makholm
real ksh available as sources
Juhapekka Tolvanen
Re: real ksh available as sources
Henning Makholm
Re: real ksh available as sources
Elie Rosenblum
Re: real ksh available as sources
Craig Sanders
AT&T source licence?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: AT&T source licence?
Henning Makholm
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: AT&T source licence?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: AT&T source licence?
Joey Hess
Re: AT&T source licence?
David Starner
Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?)
Juergen A. Erhard
Is this good enough for non-free?
Tommi Virtanen
RE: Is this good enough for non-free?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Shaul Karl
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Raul Miller
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Shaul Karl
license for iozone
bug1
Re: license for iozone
Jeff Teunissen
Re: license for iozone
bug1
License of Meschach
Chuan-kai Lin
Re: License of Meschach
Henning Makholm
Re: Free Documentation License
Joey Hess
Re: Free Documentation License
Raul Miller
Re: Free Documentation License
Jules Bean
Re: Free Documentation License
Joey Hess
Re: Free Documentation License
Jules Bean
Re: Free Documentation License
Fabien Ninoles
Re: Free Documentation License
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: Free Documentation License
Fabien Ninoles
Re: Free Documentation License
Raul Miller
[GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
SCOTT FENTON
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
William T Wilson
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Brian Kimball
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Fabien Ninoles
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Fabien Ninoles
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Marcus Brinkmann
vnterm3.3 Copyright
Ashley Clark
Re: vnterm3.3 Copyright
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: 'impact' ttf license?
Joseph Carter
Re: 'impact' ttf license?
Stefan Ott
Question
Michael Meskes
Re: Question
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Question
Ronald L . Chichester
Re: Question
SCOTT FENTON
[no subject]
Andrew McRobert
GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works"
Brian Kimball
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works"
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works"
Brian Kimball
GPL: collective works
Brian Kimball
Re: GPL: collective works
ferret
Re: GPL: collective works
Brian Kimball
Re: ARM release status
David N. Welton
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: ARM release status
Jeffry_Smith
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Branden Robinson
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement
David Starner
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Elie Rosenblum
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Henning Makholm
RE: AT&T source code agreement
Eric Sherrill
RE: AT&T source code agreement
Eric Sherrill
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Steve Greenland
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Remco Blaakmeer
RE: AT&T source code agreement
Eric Sherrill
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Henning Makholm
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Stephen C. North
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Ben Pfaff
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
example of AT&T using free license.
Mark Rafn
Re: example of AT&T using free license.
Ben Harris
Re: example of AT&T using free license.
Branden Robinson
Re: AT&T source code agreement
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
Christoph Baumann
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
David Starner
Message not available
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
David Starner
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
Mark Rafn
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
Christoph Baumann
Re: Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
Christoph Baumann
Maelstrom Copyright
Christoph Baumann
[andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Christoph Baumann
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Richard Braakman
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Branden Robinson
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Joseph Carter
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Brian Ristuccia
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Joseph Carter
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Branden Robinson
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Christoph Baumann
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Branden Robinson
Re: [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
Christoph Baumann
The last update was on 09:25 GMT Sat May 11. There are 126 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc