debian-legal Jan 2000 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Alternative trigger condition. Re: bibindex should probably be GPLed. BSD-like freedom (was Re: KDE not in Debian?) Bug#56166: base-files: copyright in motd is outdated (fwd) Difference between code and content Re: Double Standard? DVD CCA - more bad news (fwd) [f.kunkel@ecomp.net: LOGO] Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being Re: FreeVeracity shipment. Free World Licence possible improved structure. Re: From Corel on the EULA Re: FunnelWeb manuals copyright issues IBM EWS license Re: ibm jdk licence Is this license DFSG compliant? Is this Public Domain? And is it DFSG-free? Is this really patent-free LZW? kde and debian a long love story :) Re: KDE not in Debian? License - is this acceptable? License of Kermit Majordomo problems Re: need sponsorship for sphinx New OPL Draft new US crypto regulations allow source code export? Not for commercial use - non-free? the perennial pine licensing problem Re: PINE Clone Re: Release-critical Bugreport for January 7, 2000 Re: RHTVision and SETEdit, non-free? are they distributable at all? Anything that can be done about? RHTVision and SETEdit, non-free? are they distributable at all? Anything that can be done about? Some reading trn license Updating the OpenContent license Re: Uploaded mirror 2.9-13slink15 (source all) to master URGENT: Free World Licence "final" attempt. Re: vis5d license Was Re: KDE not in Debian? The last update was on 20:16 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 204 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc