Re: Was Re: KDE not in Debian?
Raul Miller wrote:
> > If all the relevant authors sign off on the statement, there would be no
> > problem. But if some authors don't sign off then that would be a problem.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 04:14:56PM -0800, David Johnson wrote:
> But this doesn't explain why kdelibs are not (or will not be) included.
> The license in question here is LGPL instead of GPL. And once they are
> included, non-GPL KDE apps can be included as well, such as a lot of
> KOffice, Cervisia, etc. Why has this stuff been left out?
I don't know anything specific about the kdelibs package. You'd have
to ask the package maintainer.