[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [New pine license]



On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:25:52PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > | Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
> > | agreement:
> > | (a) In free-of-charge or at-cost distributions by non-profit concerns;
> > | (b) In free-of-charge distributions by for-profit concerns;
> > | (c) Inclusion in a CD-ROM collection of free-of-charge, shareware, or
> > | non-proprietary software for which a fee may be charged for the
> > | packaged distribution.
> > 
> > This does not allow, say, selling a linux distribution including pine
> > on disks (I know of at least one vendor who sells debian stored on
> > IDE hard disks instead of CD-rom sets, which they should be allowed
> > to be continued).
> 
> Nor on Zips, on CD-RW, on PD, on DVD, on tape...
> 
> I can't believe that they are capable of including such a
> restriction after all the hassles, and all the input they must
> have had.

Argh, you have a point---did you send them a diff with "or similar media"
inserted between the words "CD-ROM" and "collection"?  =>

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Cylord> Would it be acceptable to debian policy if we inserted a crontab
         by default into potato that emailed bill.gates@microsoft.com
         every morning with an email that read, "Don't worry, linux is a
         fad..."

Attachment: pgpUFOwWelrrm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: