[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3589.wml}



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3589.wml	2016-05-30 23:19:47.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3589.wml	2016-05-31 11:35:33.639275210 +0500
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in gdk-pixbuf, a toolkit
- -for image loading and pixel buffer manipulation. A remote attacker can
- -take advantage of these flaws to cause a denial-of-service against an
- -application using gdk-pixbuf (application crash), or potentially, to
- -execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running the
- -application, if a malformed image is opened.</p>
+<p>Ð? gdk-pixbuf, набоÑ?е инÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?менÑ?ов длÑ? загÑ?Ñ?зки изобÑ?ажений и Ñ?абоÑ?Ñ? Ñ?
+пикÑ?елÑ?нÑ?м бÑ?Ñ?еÑ?ом, бÑ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено неÑ?колÑ?ко Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей. УдалÑ?ннÑ?й злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник можеÑ?
+иÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?и Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?и длÑ? вÑ?зова оÑ?каза в обÑ?лÑ?живании в
+пÑ?иложении, иÑ?полÑ?зÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ем gdk-pixbuf (аваÑ?ийнаÑ? оÑ?Ñ?ановка пÑ?иложениÑ?) или поÑ?енÑ?иалÑ?ного
+вÑ?полнениÑ? пÑ?оизволÑ?ного кода Ñ? пÑ?авами полÑ?зоваÑ?елÑ?, запÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ивÑ?его
+пÑ?иложение в Ñ?лÑ?Ñ?ае оÑ?кÑ?Ñ?Ñ?иÑ? Ñ?пеÑ?иалÑ?но Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?миÑ?ованного изобÑ?ажениÑ?.</p>
 
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
- -version 2.31.1-2+deb8u5.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 2.31.1-2+deb8u5.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your gdk-pixbuf packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? gdk-pixbuf.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=xDcr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: