Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> The Romanian team has worked to update the release-notes for both
> lenny and etch. Now is clear to me/us that there are 2 sets of release
> notes:
>
> - one for etch
> - one for lenny
>
> Since we are a small team, we are mostly interested in the lenny release notes.
>
> We know that there are some encoding issues for the *etch* release
> notes if compiled on etch.
Note that it is enough to recode to latin2 at po4a level or po level in
order to solve that (explained on the list).
> Also, there are some problems compiling lenny's release notes on etch
> (packages missing which need to be backported).
>From etch-backports: dblatex and xmlroff
> What is not clear:
> - Should lenny's release notes be compilable on etch?
Yes, because www-master is running etch.
> - On which distro will lenny's release notes be built? Etch or Lenny?
Etch as long as www-master is runnning etch.
--
Simon Paillard
Reply to: