[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: build of etch release-notes from svn, conflicts with sgml vs po: ro, pt, ru



Simon Paillard a scris:
> Hi,
> 
> In short: please find attached the romanian po for etch release-notes
> (result of make update-po), to be unfuzzied / translated.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:35:25PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> 2009/1/12 Simon Paillard <simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>:
>>> Please see below what you should perform to update the po file before
>>> the SGML can be safely removed.
>> As I understood, the po-s should be updated automatically with the
>> proper templates, shouldn't they?
> 
> Well, it might be understandable to let the translator perform the
> update-po himself.
> 
>>> As spotted by Rhonda, some sgml files are stored in the (etch) SVN
>>> together with their po source, as a consequence :
>>> $ svn status | grep -v ^?
>>>  M      ro/release-notes.ro.sgml
>>>  M      pt/release-notes.pt.sgml
>>>  M      ru/release-notes.ru.sgml
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, they cannot be removed straight away from the SVN,
>>> because the translations are not consistent in PO and SGML :
>>>
>>> Please see the diff between the SGML present on the SVN and the SGML
>>> generated from the PO :
>>> http://teubr.eu.org/~spaillar/debian/release-notes.etch.ro.sgml.diff
>> I looked at the diff and the new version (the working copy in the diff) was
>> replacing translations with the english texts, or just adding more paragraphs.
>>
>> There were NO paralel translations (at least they were not visible in the diff,
>> thus they would result in the same sgml, so no problem).
> 
> That may be due to translation done in the SGML but not in the po.
> 
>> If I am understanding correctly, the po files should be updated and old
>> translation would be fuzzied, like with any regular gettext-ized package, so
>> I think is safe to drop the romanian sgml.
> 
> Right :
> Please find attached the updated po for Romanian to be updated.

Andrei, te ocupi tu de asta, având în vedere că te ocupi și de alte
pagini web?

>>> The right place to change the po is :
>>> svn://svn.debian.org/ddp/manuals/tags/release-notes/etch
>> Why are we talking about *ETCH* release notes? is a parallel release like it
>> was done with sarge+etch when etch was initially released is planned?
> 
> Because some fixes (mainly typo) still occur on Etch release-notes.
> 


-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: