Re: Updated maint-guide contents, question on style -- ELF/compiled language
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> So these 2 texts are what I wanted to be a matching set.
>
> * executables written in an interpreted language such as POSIX shell
> * ELF binary executables compiled from languages such as C and C++
>
Oh, now you phrase it like that it looks great.
> If you say adding compiled before "languages" is better, I will do so.
>
> I removed ulink for ELF for all around here and left one in the later
> section on dh_shlibdeps to make PDF look nicer.
>
> (FYI: Even some text data generation can be arch-dep process if it is
> not written carefully for Unicode range characters such as BOM-less
> UCS-2.)
I hadn't thought of that.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: