[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updated maint-guide contents, question on style -- ELF/compiled language

Osamu Aoki wrote:
> So these 2 texts are what I wanted to be a matching set.
> * executables written in an interpreted language such as POSIX shell
> * ELF binary executables compiled from languages such as C and C++

Oh, now you phrase it like that it looks great.

> If you say adding compiled before "languages" is better, I will do so.
> I removed ulink for ELF for all around here and left one in the later
> section on dh_shlibdeps to make PDF look nicer.
> (FYI: Even some text data generation can be arch-dep process if it is
> not written carefully for Unicode range characters such as BOM-less
> UCS-2.) 

I hadn't thought of that.
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package

Reply to: