[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#577850: mini-buildd: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review



Quoting Stephan Sürken (absurd@olurdix.de):

> I have glanced over it, only this one seems strange:
> 
> ---
>  Template: mini-buildd-bld/mbd_lvm_vg
>  Type: string
>  Default: auto
>  Description: LVM2 volume group to use:
> - You need a dedicated lvm volume group where the chroots are
> - maintained (via schroot).
> + There will need to be a dedicated LVM volume group for the chroots
> + to be maintained on (with schroot).
> ---
> 
> "There will need to be" sound strange for my (non-native) ears ;), maybe
> just a typo?

I reviewed the thread about mini-buildd templates and this sentence
has been proposed by Justin B. Rye so I definitely confirm it is valid
and probably well idiomatic English..:-)

So, I think this paragraph can be kept. If you agree, I'll then launch
the call for translations.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: