Re: [RFR] templates://linux-2.6/{linux-base.templates,templates/temp.image.plain/templates}
- To: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFR] templates://linux-2.6/{linux-base.templates,templates/temp.image.plain/templates}
- From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:03:11 +0200
- Message-id: <20100401050311.GQ4823@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
- In-reply-to: <1270080008.8653.519.camel@localhost>
- References: <SmithReviewDebconf-linux-2.6-rfr-1270014360@mykerinos> <1270047248.8653.457.camel@localhost> <20100331163701.GA4823@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <1270080008.8653.519.camel@localhost>
Quoting Ben Hutchings (ben@decadent.org.uk):
> > OK. Point taken. Reverting to "id".
>
> I was explaining my reasoning, but I accept that ID is more common and
> may be more understandable. So, no need to revert.
Point re-taken. So re-reverting back to ID..:)
> One more try:
>
> "You should generally identify these devices by UUID or label. However,
> on MIPS systems the root device must be identified by name."
I like this one. It makes things very clear, even for non native
speakers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: