[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[TAF] templates://ucf/{templates.master}



The ucf package introduced new or modified debconf
templates. This is the perfect moment for a review to help the package
maintainer following the general suggested writing style and track
down typos and errors in the use of English language.

If someone wants to pick up this review, please answer to this mail,
in the mailing list, with an [ITR] (Intent To Review) label.

The templates file is attached.

To propose the file you reviewed for peer review, please send a [RFR]
(Request For Review) mail with the reviewed file attached...then a few
days later, when no more contributions come, a summary mail with a
[LCFC] (Last Chance For Comments) label.

Finally, after no more comments coming to the LCFC mail, you can send
the reviewed templates file as a bug report against the package.

Then, please notify the list with a last mail using a [BTS] label
with the bug number.

Helping the package maintainer to deal with induced translation
updates at that momebt will be nice. If you're not comfortable with
that part of the process, please hand it off to a translator.

-- 


Template: ucf/title
Type: title
_Description: Modified configuration file


Template: ucf/changeprompt_threeway
Type: select
__Choices: install the package maintainer's version, keep your currently-installed version, show the differences between the versions, show a side-by-side difference between the versions, show a 3 way difference between available versions of the file, do a 3 way merge between available versions of the file [Very Experimental], start a new shell to examine the situation
Default: keep your currently-installed version
_Description: What would you like to do about ${BASENAME}?
 A new version of configuration file ${FILE} is available, but your version
 has been locally modified.

Template: ucf/changeprompt
Type: select
__Choices: install the package maintainer's version, keep your currently-installed version, show the differences between the versions, show a side-by-side difference between the versions, start a new shell to examine the situation
Default: keep your currently-installed version
_Description: What would you like to do about ${BASENAME}?
 A new version of configuration file ${FILE} is available, but your version
 has been locally modified.

Template: ucf/show_diff
Type: note
_Description: The differences
 ${DIFF}
Source: ucf
XS-VCS-Arch: http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/grab/ucf
XS-VCS-Browse: http://arch.debian.org/cgi-bin/archzoom.cgi/srivasta@debian.org--lenny/ucf?expand
Section: utils
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Build-Depends-Indep: po-debconf, gettext
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0

Package: ucf
Architecture: all
Depends: debconf (>= 1.4.72) | debconf-2.0, coreutils (>= 5.91)
Recommends: debconf-utils
Description: Update Configuration File: preserves user changes to config files.
 Debian policy states that configuration files must preserve user
 changes during package upgrade.  The easy way to achieve this behavior
 is to make the configuration file a `conffile', in which case dpkg
 handles the file specially during upgrades, prompting the user as
 needed.
 .
 This is appropriate only if it is possible to distribute a default
 version that will work for most installations, although some system
 administrators may choose to modify it.  This implies that the
 default version will be part of the package distribution, and must
 not be modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at
 any other time). 
 .
 This script attempts to provide conffile like handling for files that
 can not be labelled conffiles, are not shipped in a Debian package,
 but handled by the postinst instead.  This script allows one to
 maintain files in /etc, preserving user changes and in general
 offering the same facilities while upgrading that dpkg normally
 provides for "conffiles".
 .
 Additionally, this script provides facilities for transitioning a
 file that had not been provided conffile like protection to come
 under this schema, and attempts to minimize questions asked at
 install time. Indeed, the transitioning facility is better than the
 one offered by dpkg while transitioning a file from a non-conffile to
 conffile status.
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: