[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Mapping rc-buggy to experimental.

Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:51:01 +0100
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.18~rc7+1~exp1
Distribution: rc-buggy
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
 linux-signed-amd64 (6.18~rc7+1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Sign kernel from linux 6.18~rc7-1~exp1
 .
   * New upstream release candidate.
     - mm/huge_memory: Fix initialization of huge zero folio (Closes: #1121013)
 .
   [ Bastian Blank ]
   * Introduce a base package for version sync.
 .
   [Anatoliy Gunya]
   * [arm64] Add initial Raspberry Pi 5 support
     - enable MMC_SDHCI_BRCMSTB, GPIO_BRCMSTB, PINCTRL_BRCMSTB
       and PINCTRL_BCM2712 as modules
     - enable OF_OVERLAY
     - enable MISC_RP1 as a module
Checksums-Sha1:
 cc0b3e06790e3e6e373ff31d8140883f4a714aab 9403 linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 c4b8e940553c2d76efe000ea05cf837cf0be7672 697052 linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 bb6df2b792789953d9d2c3f232122b5485f52d0887f64496512e90b1fd34a929 9403 linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 d8e17b76df8a2ef17d4f01d8b067fd7e5ebcce3754cc67914eb972495cac3d2a 697052 linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Files:
 2da31f39839b7bd90cf173fef0c78ab3 9403 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 9ddb4436db0be9ed71550d7dadfd3f35 697052 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_6.18~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSInBJdRTWyTRy0ztFCTVFtUgONCgUCaSTWzwAKCRBCTVFtUgON
ClPtAQDXhwjxv4/q9rhfD6dglId81xck8Lj4jom3reBfvLkRMQEA+cvUUUvCmnNW
3SIMlHrZKcNPfjjrymleL+NtvrKroQY=
=3+zQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpw_MgycTf3w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: