[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#939873: marked as done (qla2xxx .. Async-gnlist failed)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:51:27 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <20250219145127.AD5EABE2EE7@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #939873,
regarding qla2xxx .. Async-gnlist failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
939873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.67-2
Severity: important

The buster kernel, as well as the backports kernel
(linux-image-5.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 5.2.9-2~bpo10+1) fail to boot
sibelius.debian.org, which has some storage attached to it via,
presumably, FC.

The kernel keeps printing

| qla2xxx [...]-...: Async-gpdb failed - hdl=.. ...

and systemd keeps waiting for the devices to appear.

Screenshot of remote console attached.

-- 
                            |  .''`.       ** Debian **
      Peter Palfrader       | : :' :      The  universal
 https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                            |   `-    https://www.debian.org/

Attachment: screenshot.png
Description: PNG image


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

This bug was filed for a very old kernel or the bug is old itself
without resolution.

If you can reproduce it with

- the current version in unstable/testing
- the latest kernel from backports

please reopen the bug, see https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
for details.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: