Bug#1084908: arch:all linux-libc-dev causes problems to architecture bootstrap
- To: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>, 1084908@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
- Subject: Bug#1084908: arch:all linux-libc-dev causes problems to architecture bootstrap
- From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:05:07 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20250204140507.47xkhx4xqfi35brl@shell.thinkmo.de>
- Reply-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 1084908@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <6e4a64c4wu5eokwixxk7exonchjf3meptzx2b3nspjjipllhie@rbrsp6kpviti>
- References: <20241010160324.GA2302216@subdivi.de> <a648c819e323c899a5cd3a1e4211194a7a5df7b0.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20241204214059.eanu2g5synr5cifa@shell.thinkmo.de> <20241010160324.GA2302216@subdivi.de> <20241205073835.GB220964@subdivi.de> <20241205143053.r5ro5mv5ofghmo2z@shell.thinkmo.de> <20241010160324.GA2302216@subdivi.de> <20241205203354.GA971206@subdivi.de> <20241010160324.GA2302216@subdivi.de> <6e4a64c4wu5eokwixxk7exonchjf3meptzx2b3nspjjipllhie@rbrsp6kpviti> <20241010160324.GA2302216@subdivi.de>
Hi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 07:36:21PM -0400, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > Provides: linux-libc-dev-amd64, linux-libc-dev-arm64, ...
> We have two proposed provides schemes here, can we select one and add
> it?
Something like simple providers is the easiest to do.
> > As stated elsewhere, I still don't understand what we gained by
> > switching from Arch:any to Arch:all, but maybe I don't have to.
And I currently have no idea what to say, except to repeat myself.
> It would be helpful if this question could be answered. I think Matthias
> was asking the same question in #1081826.
I read and re-read that. Where is a question in this single message?
Just a: this is wrong. Not, what is broken by it, which makes it wrong.
Bastian
--
Even historians fail to learn from history -- they repeat the same mistakes.
-- John Gill, "Patterns of Force", stardate 2534.7
Reply to: