Hi, Le 2021-01-23 15:00, Diederik de Haas a écrit : > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 5.10.9+1 > > On zaterdag 23 januari 2021 11:05:23 CET Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 18:27, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 18:24, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> > wrote: > > > > On zaterdag 16 januari 2021 10:42:19 CET Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > > Please enable CONFIG_CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON as a module for arm64 > > > > > builds > > > > > > > > Is there a reason why it shouldn't be included in armhf builds? If not, > > > > then I'd like to see it enabled there too. > > > > (And possibly in linux-image-rpi on armel as well?) > > > > > > Agreed for armhf, assuming CONFIG_CRYPTO_ADIANTUM is already enabled > > > on those platforms too. For armel, it depends on whether kernel mode > > > NEON is already enabled in the first place. > > > > This is enabled now for armhf but not for arm64: > > > > linux-signed-arm64 (5.10.9+1) unstable; urgency=medium > > ... > > * [arm] Enable CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON. (closes: #980214) > > I first thought that '[arm]' was a shorthand for various ARM architectures, but > I just confirmed that it is indeed not fixed/enabled in arm64: > # grep CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON /boot/config-5.10.0-2-arm64 > # CONFIG_CRYPTO_NHPOLY1305_NEON is not set Indeed. I just sent a MR¹ to fix this. Cheers, Vincent ¹ https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/312
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature