Bug#959170: linux: at boot: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl ... restore 0' failed with exit code 99
Hi Vincent,
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 06:13:09PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-05-08 14:54:58 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Is this still something you are able to reproduce and have more
> > insights since then? If you are not able to reproduce it anymore,
> > should we otherwise close the issue?
>
> zira:~> journalctl | grep 'failed with exit code 99'
> May 18 14:40:58 zira systemd-udevd[461]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> May 18 14:43:03 zira systemd-udevd[488]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 17 14:44:13 zira systemd-udevd[452]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 18 11:22:05 zira systemd-udevd[464]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 10:54:58 zira systemd-udevd[452]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 11:01:26 zira systemd-udevd[432]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 11:07:31 zira systemd-udevd[456]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 11:09:43 zira systemd-udevd[444]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 11:29:22 zira systemd-udevd[449]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Sep 24 11:30:50 zira systemd-udevd[450]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Oct 18 23:19:30 zira systemd-udevd[462]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
> Oct 18 23:20:28 zira systemd-udevd[450]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
> Oct 29 02:51:50 zira systemd-udevd[452]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
> Nov 30 02:44:43 zira systemd-udevd[451]: controlC1: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 1' failed with exit code 99.
> Jan 04 21:21:29 zira systemd-udevd[458]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
> Jan 22 19:54:32 zira systemd-udevd[468]: controlC0: Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa -E XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/alsa/runtime restore 0' failed with exit code 99.
>
> So this failure hasn't occurred for a few months, but this was already
> the case between 2020-05-18 and 2020-09-17. Thus there may still be
> some possibility that it occurs again in a few weeks.
Okay and thanks for quickly report back, much appreciated.
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: