Re: recommends for apparmor in newest linux-image-4.13
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:55:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> AppArmor is the default LSM.
There is no such thing as a default LSM in Linux.
> > The changelog suggests it was done that systemd units might use it,
> > but in that case those systemd units should depend on apparmor.
>
> They don't depend on AppArmor unless it's enabled. Which is a decision
> made in the kernel configuration (potentially overriden by the kernel
> comamnd line).
So we should not need the recommends.
Reply to: