[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#812207: CVE-2016-0728



> You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug
> against a real package name in the first place.

I'm sorry for that.

2016-01-26 10:29 GMT+09:00 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:06 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2016 4:49 PM, "Ben Hutchings" <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:23 -0800, Zachary Loafman wrote:
>> > > Can this issue be treated with high importance?
>> >
>> > You would have got a faster response if you had reported the bug
>> > against a real package name in the first place.
>>
>> Apologies, I'm not actually original reporter. I was notified of the bug
>> report today and it matches something we found in internal testing after
>> using an image that had the CVE fixed. Anyone who updates to fix that CVE
>> may run across the same.
>
> Sorry, I should have looked at the messages more closely.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Q.  Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy?
> A.  I don't know and I couldn't care less.


Reply to: