On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 03:00 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 20:30 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > > > Can you please suggest, what to do next? Close this bugreport as > > > invalid, and fill new one against n2_rng module in debian, or report > > > first to lkml? Thanks. > > [...] > > > > You should send this patch upstream (linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org and > > sparclinux@vger.kernel.org mailing lists). > > Ben, > submitted to both mentioned mailing lists, it got to DaveM processing > queue, see http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/sparclinux/list/?submitter=68078 > As I told earlier, I'm not a kernel developer in any form, not even > C/C++ programmer. I'm not sure I would be able to answer to any > objections on this patch. > But thanks anyway, probably someone else (oracle guys, with their > linux for sparc [L4S] project) would be able to make this patch to > kernel. I think those will be fine except the two of them should have different subjects. DaveM will tell you what if anything he wants you to change. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part