On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 05:24 +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:51:14 +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > > This fault now also occured with version 2.6.39-3 of the > > linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64 package. > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:19:33 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I think this bug was fixed in 2.6.39-3 along with bug #629932. Let us > > know if it occurs again. > > As I see it (upper quote), this bug also occurs in the 2.6.39-3 version. Sorry, I missed your second message. I'll reopen. > It do however lack understanding of the package naming and versioning > here - the package has the name linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64, however its > version is 2.6.39-3, an aptitude update && search also does not show a > package with name 2.6.39-3 here. See <http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-versions.html>. Ben. > Attached, there is a dump of the complete kernel log on 2.6.39-3, I hope > this makes it into the bugtracker. :/ -- Ben Hutchings Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part