[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT



On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:25 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> (why do you keep replying only to the sender?)
> 
> Lars Segerlund <lars.segerlund@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> >  I think CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARy is a good choise for the default, since
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT might give a performance penalty for some loads, I think a
> > separate kernel packet for low-latency or something would be a good choise.
> 
> I see your point, but I'm still not convinced that for a desktop system
> (the -generic flavour in Debian)
[...]

Debian doesn't have a 'generic' flavour; you're thinking of Ubuntu.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
All extremists should be taken out and shot.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: