On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 08:47 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Ben Hutchings hat am Tue 26. Apr, 04:47 (+0100) geschrieben:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 23:35 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > > Jörg Sommer hat am Mon 25. Apr, 23:21 (+0200) geschrieben:
> > > > Ben Hutchings hat am Sun 03. Apr, 03:06 (+0100) geschrieben:
> > > > > /sbin/blkid -o device | while read device; do
> > > > > echo "$device:"
> > > > > /sbin/blkid -o udev -s LABEL -s UUID -s TYPE "$device"
> > > > > done
> > > >
> > > > /dev/sda1
> > > > ID_FS_UUID=a59a6be1-01ac-2c7a-12ab-c8dc8e4c3255
> > > > ID_FS_UUID_ENC=a59a6be1-01ac-2c7a-12ab-c8dc8e4c3255
> > > > ID_FS_LABEL=_grml_:0
> > > > ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=\x27grml\x27:0
> > > > ID_FS_TYPE=linux_raid_member
> > > > /dev/sda2
> > > > ID_FS_LABEL=Linux_Var
> > > > ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=Linux_Var
> > > > ID_FS_UUID=60342ce9-209a-4b60-97b5-7d9309751202
> > > > ID_FS_UUID_ENC=60342ce9-209a-4b60-97b5-7d9309751202
> > > > ID_FS_TYPE=ext4
> > >
> > > That's strange. sda2 is a RAID member. I don't know why blkid thinks it's
> > > a standalone filesystem.
> >
> > Yes, that's weird.
> >
> > But now that I look over the code again, I think the bug you found is
> > not related to this information. Does the /etc/mdadm.conf file on this
> > system use a device name wildcard?
>
> No. That's the contents:
[...]
Oh well, please try installing this package:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test_all.deb
(signature:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test_all.deb.sig ;
source:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test.dsc )
and run 'dpkg --reconfigure linux-base'. It should print an error
specifying which device is missing information.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part