[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: backporting 2.6.38 from unstable to squeeze



On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 04:03 +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If this is not the right mailing list for this question, please let me 
> know which one is. Thanks.
> 
> I just compiled the 2.6.38 linux-image Debian package from source on 
> squeeze, per the instructions in 
> http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.4.
> 
> I don't know if that was actually necessary, as the linux-image package 
> from unstable seems to install directly.

It should work, yes.

> Regardless, both the backported 
> and original linux-image packages have two dependencies which are not in 
> squeeze. These are linux-base (>= 3~) and firmware-linux-free (>= 3~). See 
> the apt-get error message below. The versions of these in squeeze are both 
> 2.6.32-31. So, my main question is, is it safe to upgrade these ie. can I 
> upgrade them without breaking my current 2.6.32 (default) kernel?

Yes.  They have to be kept backward-compatible, so that upgrades from
'squeeze' to 'wheezy' will work.

> Also, I just tried to run 2.6.26 (still installed from when I was running 
> lenny) but it crashed and dropped down to the initramfs prompt. I don't 
> have the error message handy right now, but could get it. I just want to 
> know if I am missing something obvious. Should 2.6.26 continue to work on 
> squeeze without problems, or not?
[...]

No, see
<http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev>.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: