Re: Bug#621032: linux-2.6: please add armhf support
Hi,
2011/4/15 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:51:29AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I propose this patch which enables basic functionality of Efika MX nettop
>> which it is currently in mainline 2.6.38.
>
> The configs looks strange.
> - Why is network support system specific?
Maybe it is wrong in the patch config, I really struggled with
configurations. I cross compile an uImage, test it on my system so I
got a working config, but when trying to port that to debian kernel I
really do not understand it very much. Help is appreciated.
> - What is the difference between armel and armhf kernel-wise?
It shouldn't matter which architecture compiles it, but armhf implies
VFP*, some armhf platforms (not all, but most of it) might imply NEON.
If you could comment which parts of the config look strange to you,
I'll try to fix it.
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
"Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar
System, which one day will disconnect us."
-- Day DVB-T stop working nicely
Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html
Reply to: