On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 14:15 +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > wrote: > > On 01.04.2011 14:04, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > There isn't an official spec. However the source and unit tests for the > > > DebianLinux Perl module (added to linux-base to support this command) > > > explain the rules I came up with. > > I don't feel that this is enough. I wanted something that we could agree > > on, so this could be pulled upstream and eventually also become > > guideline for other distros. Also having a spec has a benefic effect of > > clearness and it would also serve as guideline for choosing the version > > names for uploads. > > Then *you* can write a spec. Don't tell me what extra work I should be > doing. For the avoidance of doubt, this still applies: "If there are any remaining reasons to continue using the unversioned links, or additional features you think linux-version should provide, please let us know." However Vladimir's demand was out of scope. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part