On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:54 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 07:11 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 01:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I have had to revert the addition of pvhvm because it causes > > > an instant panic under KVM (at least in a 64-bit kernel). > > > > Ouch, I didn't think to try that combo! > > > > I don't suppose you managed to catch the stack anywhere? I'll try and > > repro today. > > So the fix is pretty simple (and the omission pretty embarrassing) but I > guess you'd prefer me to wait until after 2.6.32-21 before I update the > patches? [...] I'm not going to restart the build now, but we can reenable them in -22. Relatedly, why did you set CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI=y and not =m? It's generally preferable to enable features as modules where possible so they don't waste memory for users that don't need them. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part