On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 10:55 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: [...] > In the meantime I notice you've committed the patches. Can we get them > queued up for stable backports at some point? I appreciate you might > want them to bake for a bit longer in 2.6.36-rc first. > > Greg, we are talking about: > 0e8e50e20c837eeec8323bba7dcd25fe5479194c mm: make stack guard page logic use vm_prev pointer > 7798330ac8114c731cfab83e634c6ecedaa233d7 mm: make the mlock() stack guard page checks stricter > 297c5eee372478fc32fec5fe8eed711eedb13f3d mm: make the vma list be doubly linked [...] Should these go into 2.6.32-21? What exactly is the impact of not applying them? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part