On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 19:14 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:41 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > I happened to notice on packages.qa.debian.org that the kernel packages > > > have 250 lintian warnings, of which the vast majority come from just a > > > few easy to fix issues. > > > > Patch rebased on trunk with comments addressed. > > Since this steps outside of the areas where I feel comfortable > committing of my own accord I'd quite like an ACK on these changes (if > they are appropriate). ACK, except for: [...] > > diff --git a/linux-2.6/debian/linux-base.lintian-overrides b/linux-2.6/debian/linux-base.lintian-overrides > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b5593f5 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/linux-2.6/debian/linux-base.lintian-overrides > > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > > +# We cannot use a config script because it requires external tools > > +# just to work out whether it should ask any questions, and a config > > +# script may be run before the package dependencies are satisfied. > > +linux-base: no-debconf-config [...] I accept Steve Langasek's reasoning that this should not be overridden. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part