On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:00:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > The rtl8192s_usb driver was claiming a number of device IDs which are
> > actually supported by the code in the rtl8192u_usb driver. Remove
> > them from rtl8192s_usb, and add more device IDs as listed in the
> > vendor driver version 0003.0825.2009.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> > ---
> > I don't know whether the device IDs I'm adding actually work, but we may
> > as well let people try them.
>
> I just applied a patch from Florian that should have worked all of this
> out. Can you look at the linux-next tree tomorrow and verify that it is
> all ok now?
>
> If not, can you resend whichever ids from these two patches that you
> feel are still needed to be changed?
The result in rtl8192su basically matches what I have, although Florian
seems to have found a new version of the vendor driver with a few more
IDs. (Florian, please send me it so I can add it to the archive at
<http://people.debian.org/~benh/rtl-wlan/>.)
I believe the second patch, for rtl8192u, is still applicable.
At the end of the table in rtl8192su, Florian added:
+ /* these are not in the official list */
+ {USB_DEVICE(0x050d, 0x815F)}, /* Belkin F5D8053 v6 */
+ {USB_DEVICE(0x0df6, 0x004b)}, /* WL-349 */
However the first of these is included in the vendor driver... and
further up the table in our version!
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part