Bug#586568: dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, <STDIN> line 10. Logical sector size is zero.
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#586568: dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, <STDIN> line 10. Logical sector size is zero.
- From: pitamila <pitamila@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:31:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20100620163112.6605.11718.reportbug@ketch>
- Reply-to: pitamila <pitamila@free.fr>, 586568@bugs.debian.org
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii libuuid-perl 0.02-3+b1 Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii udev 147-4 /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii util-linux 2.16.1-4 Miscellaneous system utilities
linux-base recommends no packages.
linux-base suggests no packages.
-- debconf information:
linux-base/disk-id-manual-boot-loader:
linux-base/disk-id-manual:
linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan-no-relabel: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-auto: true
here is my partition table as shown by parted.
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 32.3kB 200GB 200GB primary ntfs boot
2 200GB 240GB 40.0GB primary ext3
3 240GB 1000GB 760GB extended lba
5 240GB 248GB 8000MB logical linux-swap(v1)
6 248GB 446GB 198GB logical ext3
I don't understand the "Logical sector size is zero." message
before
"dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, <STDIN> line
10."
Any advise using dosfslabel on my system to diagnose more precisely the problem is
welcome.
I hope it's not because of any missusing of partition.
Reply to: