On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:59 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > unarchive 573189 > reopen 573189 > found 553472 2.6.34-1~experimental.2 > thanks > > ...and the story of being ignored apparently continues :( > > ---snip--- > r15628 | maks | 2010-05-05 23:44:47 +0200 (Wed, 05 May 2010) | 4 lines > > sync to 2.6.34-rc6 > > disabled arm feature patches, nuked merged stuff, disabled aufs, > fixed orig generation. > ---snap--- > > why can't you guys not a) communicate when you disable things other > people relay on and, b) write better commit messages (e.g. in case the > disabling was just temporary, so that we don't need to constantly worry)? Why can't you understand that: - squeeze is going to use 2.6.32 - experimental is experimental - aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part