[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#584945: linux-2.6: 0bda:8172 Realtek USB WiFi unsupported



Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.34-1~experemental.2
Severity: normal

This device should be supported (at least it says that on the cover, and
supplied driver, which does not compile anymore).
It is detected, but then returns: unknown rf chip, can't set channel map
in function:rtl819x_set_channel_map() in dmesg

Seems to be a related problem to the recently fixed #580740
The device gets an interface, but no rf signals seem to be detected
(compared to a wifi card next to it, right next to the AP).

Full dmesg output is:
[  996.420056] usb 3-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and
address 7
[  996.563524] usb 3-2: not running at top speed; connect to a high
speed hub
[  996.586066] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0bda,
idProduct=8192
[  996.586074] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
SerialNumber=0
[  996.586082] usb 3-2: Product: 802.11n WLAN Adapter
[  996.586087] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: Realtek
[  996.595937] ==>ep_num:6, in_ep_num:1, out_ep_num:5
[  996.595943] ==>RtInPipes:3  
[  996.595949] ==>RtOutPipes:4  5  6  7  13  
[  996.595959] ==>txqueue_to_outpipemap for BK, BE, VI, VO, HCCA, TXCMD,
MGNT, HIGH, BEACON:
[  996.595965] 3  2  1  0  4  4  4  4  4  
[  996.635059] Dot11d_Init()
[  996.635063] rtl819xU:unknown rf chip, can't set channel map in
function:rtl819x_set_channel_map()
[  996.635065] 
[  996.705600] udev: renamed network interface wlan0 to wlan11

lsusb:
0bda:8192 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'),
(500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
42

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: