On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 02:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:03 +0200, Alberto wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 at 18:13:55 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> Is the notify patch included on this module backport? It helps a lot > > >> to free compressed RAM not used anymore. Acording to the description, > > > > >This does not appear to have been accepted upstream yet. If it has, > > >please provide a reference (commit hash and repository URL). > > > > > > It seems that some patches have been accepted for 2.6.35: > > > > http://email@example.com/msg00182.html > > > > I don't have the skills to evaluate if backporting this feature > > would be feassible, or too intrusive. > > This looks possible to backport, but it will involve an ABI bump (hence > a change of binary package names) so I won't apply the changes straight > away. "Alberto" gave a fake email address, so I won't put any more work into this until a real person requests it (with a separate bug report, as this one is now closed). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part