On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 23:20 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:53:43PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On 2010-02-17, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:29:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > >> hello, > > >> > > >> > > >> could we please move on trunk branch to sid, > > >> so that 2.6.33 patches can be applied. > > >> > > >> I have an local 2.6.33~rc8 branch and be more then happy > > >> to have it public. Also the plan is to upload 2.6.33 to > > >> experimental, it would be a good test bed for the libata switch? > > > > > > I don't see the point. Right now we should be concentrating on squeeze > > > (and important fixes for lenny). 2.6.33 seems like a distraction. > > 2.6.33 is shiping with ton of fixes, it is important to have it for > testers, so that we can backport if needed or alert upstream. > not working in 2.6.32 won't cut soonest. So you want it as a quick way for users to check for fixes? That does sound useful. > also why wouldn't you want to test your libata switch script. > the sooner the better. I don't see how this is connected to the new kernel version though. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part