On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:27 +1100, paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > You wrote: > > > The OP asked us to report the bug, so I assumed he didn't. > > Seems you did not pay attention to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#86 > written a week before your cloning: > > >> Seeing your reluctance to "talk" to kernel-package, I now reported > >> Bug#568823. Your bug is just one of many I have looked at in the last week, and I do not remember every detail of those bugs. Sorry for the mistake. > Of course none of this matters at all. Kernel-package is now "fixed", > linux-2.6 will be fixed sometime in the far future and wrongly because > they speak about repeated patterns not about "reasonable" perl code. I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. I asked you to send patches for linux-2.6, and you refused. > But it all does not matter because no-one seems to care much about > Debian stable (currently lenny) ... oh well, will patch myself. I fixed this in the svn branch for lenny and it should be in the next stable update. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part