[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#565789: marked as done (say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be)



Your message dated Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:08:22 +0100
with message-id <20100201150822.GZ9849@stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be
has caused the Debian Bug report #565789,
regarding say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
565789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: wishlist
File: /lib/modules/2.6.32-trunk-686/kernel/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.ko
X-debbugs-Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org

We see
ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.23
http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
ThinkPad BIOS 1WET88WW (2.08 ), EC 1VHT28WW-1.04
IBM ThinkPad R50e, model 1834NV1
WARNING: Outdated ThinkPad BIOS/EC firmware
WARNING: This firmware may be missing critical bug fixes and/or important features

Perhaps it could mention what it believes the current versions should
be, so we can check the IBM website before decide we have send the unit
back to IBM to get whatever it is that is bothering it updated (as we
Linux users can't update the BIOS ourselves.)

Also it could mention perhaps some URLs on where it got its information
about what is current from.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:

> On jeu., 2010-01-21 at 13:29 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> > >>>>> "SM" == Shannon McMackin <smcmackin@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > SM> I think it's wonderful that the current version at least knows
> > what
> > SM> the current BIOS rev is, that in itself is a huge amount of work
> > to
> > SM> add in considering the variety of ThinkPad models.
> > 

upstream decided not to add the requested addtional info.

It seems more appropriate to ask Lenovo for better Linux support.
as this beyond a debian bug, closing.
thanks for the report.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: