Your message dated Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:53:30 +0100 with message-id <20081120165330.GC26909@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> and subject line no bug has caused the Debian Bug report #475674, regarding source package rules.gen build does not generate -common headers to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 475674: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475674 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: source package rules.gen build does not generate -common headers
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:51:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20080412085145.GA6854@lapse.madduck.net>
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.24-5 Severity: wishlist I wanted to apply a patch to the kernel yesterday, and after running into problems with make-kpkg, I found http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage and adopted the method. I even rewrote most of the wiki page to make sure it applies. Comments welcome, of course. My problem now is that the single kernel variant instructions only yield 8 packages: linux-image-2.6.24-1+foo.1-686_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-headers-2.6.24-1+foo.1-686_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-support-2.6.24-1+foo.1-686_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-tree-2.6.24_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.24_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-source-2.6.24_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-manual-2.6.24_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-5+foo.1_i386.deb Unfortunately, linux-headers-2.6.24-1+foo.1-686 depends on linux-headers-2.6.24-1+foo.1-common, but that is not being created until I build binary-arch_i386, which takes infinitely longer. Shouldn't the binary-arch_i386_none_686 target build the common headers too, since its result depends on them? -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1+scoflowctrl.1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systemsAttachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 475674-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: no bug
- From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:53:30 +0100
- Message-id: <20081120165330.GC26909@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
I don't consider this a bug. You can always disable any arch/featureset/flavour you don't need and use debuild. Bastian -- Oblivion together does not frighten me, beloved. -- Thalassa (in Anne Mulhall's body), "Return to Tomorrow", stardate 4770.3.
--- End Message ---