Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses
- To: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: 425050@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses
- From: Tim Dijkstra <newsuser@famdijkstra.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:25:13 +0200
- Message-id: <20070520202513.64097d19@commensaal.drs.p>
- Reply-to: Tim Dijkstra <newsuser@famdijkstra.org>, 425050@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20070520143527.GA4343@hardeman.nu>
- References: <20070518062635.GA10686@lapse.madduck.net> <200705180842.31703.debian@hendrik-sattler.de> <20070518071215.GA14806@lapse.madduck.net> <20070518144141.GI7143@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <20070518165146.0c3d5cfa@commensaal.drs.p> <20070518172509.GB26438@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <20070518194212.5f81374f@commensaal.drs.p> <20070518212625.4b20d1d1@commensaal.drs.p> <20070519163210.GE13875@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <20070520090802.GA11240@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <20070520143527.GA4343@hardeman.nu>
Please cc: the bug report
On Sun, 20 May 2007 16:35:27 +0200
David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu> wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >They can set their debconf priority. It's not something to avoid,
> >adding debconf questions
> >
> >Anyway, I propose that update-initramfs just loses the -k switch or
> >provides a new wrapper that packages like cryptsetup and mdadm just
> >call without worrying whether it will update all initrds or just the
> >current one.
>
> I agree...use a debconf or config file option, then let packages call
> update-initramfs with a new option (let's call it "-p") and the option
> will be automatically honoured so that one or all initramfs images are
> rebuilt.
That seems sensible to me. Maximilian, what do you think? Is this
acceptable to you?
grts Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: