[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#422161: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64: problem not seen in 2.6.20



On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:38:05AM +1000, jim wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
> Followup-For: Bug #422161
> 
> This problem is not seen in linux-image-2.6.20-1-sparc64

I cannot reproduce. Can you provide dmesg output?

udannf@sparc:~$ uname -a
Linux sparc 2.6.18-4-sparc64 #1 Mon Mar 26 11:16:07 UTC 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux
dannf@sparc:~$ cat /proc/iomem
7fd00000000-7fd7fffffff : /pci@8,600000
  7fd000a0000-7fd000bffff : Video RAM area
  7fd000c0000-7fd000c7fff : Video ROM
  7fd000f0000-7fd000fffff : System ROM
  7fd00100000-7fd00100fff : 0000:00:04.0
    7fd00100000-7fd00100fff : qla2xxx
  7fd00120000-7fd0013ffff : 0000:00:04.0
7fe00000000-7fe7fffffff : /pci@8,700000
  7fe000a0000-7fe000bffff : Video RAM area
  7fe000c0000-7fe000c7fff : Video ROM
  7fe000f0000-7fe000fffff : System ROM
  7fe00100000-7fe0011ffff : 0001:00:05.1
    7fe00100000-7fe0011ffff : sungem
  7fe00120000-7fe001207ff : 0001:00:05.2
    7fe00120000-7fe001207ff : ohci1394
  7fe00122000-7fe001227ff : 0001:00:05.2
  7fe00124000-7fe001240ff : 0001:00:06.0
    7fe00124000-7fe001240ff : sym53c8xx
  7fe00126000-7fe00126fff : 0001:00:06.0
    7fe00126000-7fe00126fff : sym53c8xx
  7fe00128000-7fe001280ff : 0001:00:06.1
    7fe00128000-7fe001280ff : sym53c8xx
  7fe0012a000-7fe0012afff : 0001:00:06.1
    7fe0012a000-7fe0012afff : sym53c8xx
  7fe0012c000-7fe0012cfff : 0001:00:01.1
  7fe00130000-7fe0013ffff : 0001:00:01.0
  7fe00140000-7fe0015ffff : 0001:00:01.0
  7fe00400000-7fe007fffff : 0001:00:05.1
  7fe00800000-7fe00bfffff : 0001:00:05.2
  7fe00c00000-7fe00ffffff : 0001:00:05.3
  7fe01000000-7fe01007fff : 0001:00:05.3
    7fe01000000-7fe01007fff : ohci_hcd
  7fe01400000-7fe017fffff : 0001:00:05.0
  7fe02000000-7fe03ffffff : 0001:00:01.0
  7fe08000000-7fe0fffffff : 0001:00:01.0
  7fe7d000000-7fe7dffffff : 0001:00:05.0
  7fe7e000000-7fe7e7fffff : 0001:00:05.0

-- 
dann frazier




Reply to: