Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
>
> > > >what about that?
> > > >
> > > >debian-devel-kernel@
>
> > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> > > it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
> > > debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are
> > > drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new
> > > list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-).
> >
> > I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the
> > mbox names nicely together. :-)
>
> :-)
>
> debian-kernel-maint?
debian-kernel-bugs ?
If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is
by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be
confusing.
> on second thought, we run in the problem that Debian these days
> supports more than one kernel, which already lead to changes of
> package names.
Well; the idea was that this list was open to all debian kernels, not just the
linux ones. This didn'r really happen though, but i think it is still true.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: