[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: note on "2.4 is deprecated"



dann frazier wrote:
> If for no other reason, upstream release process changes will likely
> make this much more difficult.  As I'm sure you know, 2.6 is being
> actively developed indefinitely, as opposed to the previous method of
> branching off and stabalising a development tree.  Since there is no
> existing plan for a 2.8, 2.4 would need to be maintained indefinitely
> to continue a major + major-1 support model.

Sure, I think there's something to the point someone else made in this
thread that each 2.6.x is essentially a new major version now. Although
clearly not quite the same as before.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: