Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
- To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@ieee.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 09:14:14 -0500
- Message-id: <87lkug8895.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- References: <20060323051316.GA2508@kitenet.net> <20060323174223.GB32186@dp.vpn.nusquama.org> <20060324061645.GA29531@kitenet.net> <20060324142900.GB6461@dp.vpn.nusquama.org> <20060325233323.GA11021@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603281958160.3547@bobcat> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0604032224190.3933@bobcat> <20060405152036.GA3751@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0604052107390.3421@bobcat> <20060406060946.GA25039@localhost.localdomain> <20060406075624.GA23202@debian>
On 6 Apr 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
> * Sven Luther [Thu, Apr 06 2006, 08:09:46AM]:
>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:12:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, directly using make-kpkg as was the recomended way until now
>>>> is no more supported ?
>>>
>>> Recommended by whom? :-) I did not explore the issue in detail,
>>> but we
>>
>> By Manoj :), as well as dh_make -k too.
>
> make-kpkg or m-a, that does not matter, they basically use the same
> command line interface introduced by Manoj and slightly refined.
What was the slight refinement?
manoj
--
The first and worst of all frauds is to cheat oneself. All sin is
easy after that. -- Baily
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: