Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
- To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion
- From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:56:24 +0200
- Message-id: <20060406075624.GA23202@debian>
- In-reply-to: <20060406060946.GA25039@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20060323051316.GA2508@kitenet.net> <20060323174223.GB32186@dp.vpn.nusquama.org> <20060324061645.GA29531@kitenet.net> <20060324142900.GB6461@dp.vpn.nusquama.org> <20060325233323.GA11021@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603281958160.3547@bobcat> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0604032224190.3933@bobcat> <20060405152036.GA3751@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0604052107390.3421@bobcat> <20060406060946.GA25039@localhost.localdomain>
#include <hallo.h>
* Sven Luther [Thu, Apr 06 2006, 08:09:46AM]:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:12:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > >So, directly using make-kpkg as was the recomended way until now is no more
> > >supported ?
> >
> > Recommended by whom? :-) I did not explore the issue in detail, but we
>
> By Manoj :), as well as dh_make -k too.
make-kpkg or m-a, that does not matter, they basically use the same
command line interface introduced by Manoj and slightly refined.
dh_make has also moved from it's own template's to m-a's includes,
AFAICS in May 2005.
Eduard.
Reply to: