On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:59:17AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Guido Trotter wrote: > > Absolutely true! The current xen team is fully agrees on this position! > xen 3.0 is out since the 6th of december! > so it has seen considerable amount of production use since. > as the xen userspace is tightly integrated to the xen kernel, > it makes a lot of sense to release both in the same run. But it doesn't make sense to release them both as part of the same source package, and it doesn't necessarily make sense to keep them in the same svn repo. Can you explain why it's better for the xen userspace/hypervisor packages to be kept under the aegis of the kernel team, instead of for Bastian (and other interested developers) to join the pkg-xen team? Is there really so much more interest in the xen-tools among the members of the kernel team than among the, er, Xen team? > the debian kernel team has always been open to valuable input. > beeing just annoyed and threatening to bypass on weblog doesn't > put your team on a good light. Holding all the members of the pkg-xen team responsible for what one of their fellows has written in his blog would be petty and immature, and would not exactly be the kind of encouragement one would hope to see from the kernel team seeking the input of others interested in Xen packaging. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature