Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3

To: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
Cc: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>(linux-2.6 #353516)
Subject: Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:48:46 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.114036244926952.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1140362423.16664.17.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1140362423.16664.17.camel@localhost>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 353516
Bug#353516: linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks, control, and have a nice day
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#353516: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
  - From: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: Bug#353516: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
Next by Date: Bug#353516: marked as done (linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different)
Previous by thread: Bug#353516: Processed: Re: Bug#227386: libc6-dev: ENOTSUP==EOPNOTSUPP, which violates SUSv3
Next by thread: Bug#353516: marked as done (linux-2.6: ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUPP should be different)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread