[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#349338: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8: bug in VIDIOCSWIN ioctl32 (32/64-bit compat layer))

Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:12:43 +0100
with message-id <20060202191243.GE25316@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
and subject line Not an NMU, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2006 12:25:49 +0000
>From aurelien@aurel32.net Sun Jan 22 04:25:49 2006
Return-path: <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F0eI1-0003qB-DB
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:25:49 -0800
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
	by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1F0eI0-0004Zc-1b; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:25:48 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>)
	id 1F0eHz-0002gg-4n; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:25:47 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8: bug in VIDIOCSWIN ioctl32 (32/64-bit compat
Message-ID: <20060122122547.10211.43503.reportbug@bode.aurel32.net>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:25:47 +0100
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.15-3.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


It may be a bit strange, but I am using a Debian amd64 kernel on an i386
installation. I have problems with my TV card, as the VIDIOCSWIN ioctl 
always fail.

This is a bug in the 32/64-bit compat layer, a patch is available on
 http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/19/35 . It has been merged in version

Note that this bug does not seems to be specific to i386/amd64, as the
person who wrote the patch did it for sparc64. It probably affects all
systems with a 64-bit kernel and a 32-bit userland, ie amd64, hppa64, 
sparc64 and powerpc64.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 depends on:
ii  e2fsprogs     1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.31-1 ext2 file system utilities and lib
ii  module-init-t 3.2.2-1                    tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux- 0.0.12-3                   Yet Another mkInitRD

linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

Received: (at 349338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 19:12:53 +0000
>From freddy@lowpingbastards.de Thu Feb 02 11:12:53 2006
Return-path: <freddy@lowpingbastards.de>
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de
	([] helo=mail.lowpingbastards.de ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F4jsz-0004XX-Gt; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:12:53 -0800
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de (freddy@localhost.lowpingbastards.de [])
	by mail.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k12JChpq016118
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:12:43 +0100
Received: (from freddy@localhost)
	by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k12JCh92016117;
	Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:12:43 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:12:43 +0100
From: Frederik Schueler <fs@debian.org>
To: 347556-done@bugs.debian.org, 347711-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: Not an NMU, closing.
Message-ID: <20060202191243.GE25316@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HnQK338I3UIa/qiP"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


The last upload was an NMU only by accident. Closing the fixed bugs by

Best regards
Frederik Schueler


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)



Reply to: