Bug#325726: trying 2.6.13
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:35:40AM -0000, Carl Johnstone wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I've not had a proper chance to test yet - I've been moved to another
> project at work so this box is currently a secondary priority.
>
> On initial tests 2.6.13 seems to be better, certainly I've managed to get
> the array to setup and seemingly sync. It died again whilst copying across
> some data - not had chance to investigate exactly what has happened though.
2.6.14-1 is in unstable right now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: