Bug#315931: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7: dmesg, lsmod
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, David N. Welton wrote:
> Assertion failure in journal_put_journal_head() at fs/jbd/journal.c:1824: "jh->b_jcount > 0"
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/jbd/journal.c:1824!
> invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
> PREEMPT
> Modules linked in: ipv6 e100 mii via_ircc irda crc_ccitt capability commoncap ide_cd cdrom genrtc ext3 jbd mbcache ide_generic via82cxxx ide_disk ide_core unix font vesafb cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<df8951ac>] Not tainted
> EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.8-2-k7)
> EIP is at journal_put_journal_head+0x9c/0xb0 [jbd]
> eax: 00000060 ebx: ca9964ac ecx: c02bb418 edx: c02bb418
> esi: 004c004c edi: dee68000 ebp: d29ed96c esp: dee69da0
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process kswapd0 (pid: 36, threadinfo=dee68000 task=dee305e0)
> Stack: df8965c0 df895615 df896f4e 00000720 df897071 d29ed96c ca9964ac df88efb1
> ca9964ac d29ed96c cf8cf644 00000012 d66484a4 00000000 c119a120 deb7b840
> dee68000 dee69ebc df8a3351 deb7b840 c119a120 000000d0 deb54afc 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<df88efb1>] journal_try_to_free_buffers+0x61/0xe0 [jbd]
> [<df8a3351>] ext3_releasepage+0x41/0x80 [ext3]
> [<c0156841>] try_to_release_page+0x51/0x70
> [<c0140e5c>] shrink_list+0x3cc/0x4d0
> [<c013fd6d>] __pagevec_lru_add+0xcd/0x100
> [<c01410aa>] shrink_cache+0x14a/0x340
> [<c014078a>] shrink_slab+0x8a/0x190
> [<c014185a>] shrink_zone+0x9a/0xc0
> [<c0141c81>] balance_pgdat+0x211/0x280
> [<c0141db7>] kswapd+0xc7/0xe0
> [<c0119d30>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> [<c0105fde>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x14
> [<c0119d30>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> [<c0141cf0>] kswapd+0x0/0xe0
> [<c0104291>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x14
> Code: 0f 0b 20 07 4e 6f 89 df 8b 43 04 e9 76 ff ff ff 8d 74 26 00
> <6>note: kswapd0[36] exited with preempt_count 2
> Adding 1461872k swap on /dev/hda5. Priority:-2 extents:1
woow that seems really early on boot
does another kernel work?
tried kernel-image-2.6.11 from testing?
looks a bit like a hardware problem most likely.
--
maks
Reply to: