Bug#289721: marked as done (console switching much slower than 2.6.9)
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:35:00 +0200
with message-id <20050609013500.GL3104@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#289721: fixed in 2.6.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 18:02:58 +0000
>From strasser@uni-bremen.de Mon Jan 10 10:02:58 2005
Return-path: <strasser@uni-bremen.de>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Co3sY-0001ps-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:02:58 -0800
Received: from p5481111d.dip.t-dialin.net ([127.0.0.1]) [84.129.17.29]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Co3sX-00012r-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:02:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Strasser <strasser@uni-bremen.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: console switching much slower than 2.6.9
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:05:28 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: strasser@uni-bremen.de
Message-Id: <E1Co3sX-00012r-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-3
Severity: minor
console switching(not: switching from/to X11) is noticeably slower than with 2.6.9, at least with radeonfb.
configured with make oldconfig
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii bzip2 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289721-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2005 01:34:50 +0000
>From max@stro.at Wed Jun 08 18:34:50 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DgBwX-0007Eu-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:34:49 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530065C011
for <289721-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:34:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DgBwi-0008Us-IU
for 289721-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:35:00 +0200
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:35:00 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 289721-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#289721: fixed in 2.6.11
Message-ID: <20050609013500.GL3104@sputnik.stro.at>
References: <[🔎] 200506090305.39389.strasser@uni-bremen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200506090305.39389.strasser@uni-bremen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 289721-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005, Stefan Strasser wrote:
> fixed in 2.6.11
>
thanks for testing. :)
closing therefor.
--
maks
Reply to: